News

 

GMAC halts foreclosures

In what has quickly become a national story, GMAC has suspended actions in all foreclosure cases in 23 states, including Florida. 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-20/gmac-mortgage-halts-home-foreclosures-in-23-states-including-florida-n-y-.html

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/foreclosures/index.html

There is undoubtedly more to come on this huge, breaking story.  At this point, though, here is what I know (from my own experience as a foreclosure defense attorney with hundreds of cases in Florida). 

Within the past two weeks, I have received notices, in three different cases in which I am counsel, purporting to withdraw an affidavit that had been filed in that case.  There are many similarities among these notices.  Specifically, in all three cases:

1.  The affidavit was used to support a motion for summary judgment (by itemizing the amounts allegedly owed on that note/mortgage). 

Significantly, this is how hundreds of thousands of foreclosure cases have been “pushed through” in Florida – by individuals signing an affidavit stating the total amount owed and the Court accepting that affidavit and granting a Final Judgment of Foreclosure. 

2.  The affiant was Jeffrey Stephan, who purportedly signed, under oath, as a “Limited Signing Officer” for GMAC Mortgage, LLC. 

3.  The Note was securitized, i.e. the Plaintiff is a trust (Deutsche Bank, “as trustee,” or The Bank of New York Mellon, “as trustee”). 

4.  The law firm for the Plaintiff was Florida Default Law Group (one of the three firms currently under investigation by the Florida Attorney General). 

5.  The law firm, Florida Default, tried to withdraw Mr. Stephan’s affidavit “pursuant to Rule 4-3.3, Rules of Professional Conduct of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.”  (If you’re not familiar with the language in that rule, click here.  As you can see, this is really serious stuff.  For instance, subsection (b) of the Rule discusses a lawyer’s obligations when a client engages in criminal or fraudulent conduct.)

6.  The law firm, Florida Default, admits “the information in the affidavit may not have been properly verified by the affiant [Mr. Stephan].” 

For a sample Affidavit and Notice, click here – GMAC Affidavit, Withdrawal

Again, I’m sure there will be more to this story in the coming days.  At this point, though, here’s what I’m thinking. 

Florida Default must realize the affidavits signed by Mr. Stephan are either untrue or insufficient to support summary judgment (or both).  Otherwise they would not be taking the unprecedented step of withdrawing the affidavits.  GMAC must realize these same things, or it wouldn’t be taking the unprecedented step of stopping all foreclosure cases. 

What does that mean for the average person?  Well, if you have a case pending and GMAC is the plaintiff or the servicer for the plaintiff, your case will probably be stagnant for a while.  But what about those individuals who have already been foreclosed? 

Rule 1.540, Fla.R.Civ.P., authorizes a party who has lost a case, e.g. via entry of Final Judgment of Foreclosure, to move to vacate the Final Judgment on the grounds of fraud.  Under the circumstances, it’s hardly a stretch to say there may be thousands of people in Florida who have lost their homes as a result of fraud.  

Let me put it this way: 

If you are a defendant in a foreclosure case in which GMAC was or is the Plaintiff, or in which GMAC was or is the servicer, I welcome you to contact my office for a free consultation, especially if Jeffrey Stephen signed an affidavit in your case.

Even if your foreclosure case is already over, there may be grounds to vacate it. 

In fact, you may be able to move back into your home (even if you’ve already been foreclosed). 

If your case is still pending, I strongly urge you to look closely at the affidavits that have been filed in your case.  Have they been signed by Jeffrey Stephan?  Someone else with GMAC?  Bear in mind – just because GMAC is not the Plaintiff does not mean it’s not the servicer, and often it’s the servicer that files affidavits. 

The scariest part about all of this is that, in my view, this is just the tip of the iceberg.  I strongly believe the actions that caused Florida Default to withdraw the affidavits of Jeffrey Stephan, and for GMAC to halt all foreclosure cases, are prevalent in many other cases, with many other affiants and many other banks.  Consider this development yet another reason to defend your foreclosure case with a competent foreclosure defense attorney.  You just never know – maybe we’ll find fraud in your case, too.

Posted in Main | 23 Comments »

23 Responses to GMAC halts foreclosures

  1. Pingback: Report: Title Insurance company stops insuring Chase Foreclosures | Bailout and Financial Crisis News

  2. Pingback: Report: Title Insurance company stops insuring Chase Foreclosures « Finance Law Blog

  3. Pingback: Report: Title Insurance company stops insuring Chase Foreclosures « Finance Law Blog

  4. Pingback: Risks & Loans » Blog Archive » Report: Title Insurance company stops insuring Chase Foreclosures

  5. Pingback: Report: Title Insurance company stops insuring Chase Foreclosures « Finance Blog

  6. Pingback: Economics – Report: Title Insurance company stops insuring Chase Foreclosures

  7. Pingback: Report: Title Insurance company stops insuring Chase Foreclosures

  8. I just can not believe this! You are so right!

  9. Pingback: Why did the mortgage servicers use "robo-signers"? | Bailout and Financial Crisis News

  10. Pingback: Why did the mortgage servicers use "robo-signers"? - Economics | Business News Online

  11. Pingback: Why did the mortgage servicers use "robo-signers"?

  12. Pingback: Why did the mortgage servicers use "robo-signers"? « Finance Blog

  13. Pingback: Why did the mortgage servicers use "robo-signers"? | iPhone Development News

  14. Pingback: Why did the mortgage servicers use "robo-signers"? « Finance Law Blog

  15. Pingback: Foreclosure-Gate Primer: Here’s Why The Banks Used Robo-Signers | Bailout and Financial Crisis News

  16. Pingback: Forex – Why did the mortgage servicers use "robo-signers"?

  17. Pingback: Foreclosure-Gate Primer: Here’s Why The Banks Used Robo-Signers | SHOUTing GORIlla

  18. Mr Fitzgerald says:

    I am a NYC Firefighter, having trouble making my mortgage due to firstly, mi fiance in an unknow psychological fit left our home, and secondly due to needing surgery after an injury sustained while working asa firefighter. I have fallen behind a month and a half and GMAC offered me a forebarence which caused moreharm then good. They did this under the premise that I would receive a modification. This action was denied twice and is under review for a third time. Approx 6 months have passed and I have been served with a Summons toAnswer Foreclosure. I want to save my home, and with some help, like a modification it would be possible. Is there any advice you can give or some degree of aid, because I’m sinking rapidly at this time.

    Thanks,
    SJ Fitzgerald
    (516)996-9489

  19. Rufus Kinikini says:

    Thank you – I liked this post.

  20. Online Games says:

    Hello, I think your blog is epic. Congrats.

  21. Wayne Baird says:

    Our home was included in chapter 7 bankruptcy here in Florida. Now, 2 years later GMAC has NOT foreclosed because of lost paperwork. The house is still in our name. Can we legally get back in the house? We contacted GMAC default division (in Mexico City, Mexico) about refinancing. Posts on the internet say to watch out, and be careful of GMAC default refinancing. In other words not to do business with them. Can we get back into the home?

    • Mark Stopa says:

      Can you get back into the home? …. If you’re still on title, and it sounds like you are, then yes – you own the home and are entitled to possession.
      The fact that you “surrendered” the home in a Chapter 7 does not change this – unless you were removed from title (either because the Chapter 7 trustee sold the home in the bankruptcy, which is unusual, or the home was sold after a foreclosure sale, it is still yours).

      Feel free to contact us for more specific information.
      Mark

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Anti-Spam Quiz: