News

 

I’m Getting Rich, Banker-Style!!!

I figured out how I’m going to get rich, and I’m so confident it’s going to work that I’m posting it on this blog.  Here’s my strategy…

I’m going to go to Office Depot and have them print me a stamp that says:

Pay to the Order of:   Stopa Law Firm

___________________________

Without Recourse, Mark Stopa, Asst. V.P. of Foreclosure Documentation

I’ll stamp this on every “original” promissory note I can find, sign my name on the line, and file foreclosure lawsuits on all of these properties, naming Stopa Law Firm as the Plaintiff.  If anyone tries to question the legitimacy or authenticity of the endorsement, I’ll simply say “judge, the note is self-authenticating, and I’ve filed the original.”  I’ll then shovel in my ill-gotten gains by the millions as hard-working, Florida homeowners get foreclosed, hundreds at a time.  By the time anyone questions my nefarious acts, I’ll have sailed off into the sunset, counting my tens of millions, ala David Stern.

OK, back to reality … Does this even begin to sound reasonable to you?  Do you think I’d seriously entertain this, even for a moment?  Of course not.  It’s not only immoral, it’s illegal … and I’d obviously never do it.  So why am I talking about it?

Well, this is what banks are doing on a regular basis in foreclosure cases throughout Florida.  Instead of procuring the “wet-ink” signatures of agents from the banks that supposedly transferred the notes/mortgages to them, banks are stamping endorsements onto notes, often without the knowledge/consent of the person whose signature the endorsement is supposed to represent.

For example, suppose U.S. Bank transfers a Note/Mortgage to Bank of America.  Typically, the way it’s done (or supposed to be done, at least) is a President, Vice President, or other, high-ranking officer of U.S. Bank signs an endorsement on the original Note and transfers possession of the Note to Bank of America.  Bank of America then goes to court with the original Note, with an endorsement, and sues for foreclosure.

That’s how it’s supposed to work … only that’s not reality.

In the real world, banks like Bank of America don’t have wet-ink signatures on their endorsements.  Instead, they rely on “endorsements” which aren’t signed at all, but are stamped – literally a stamp of someone’s signature … like a stamp you’d buy at Office Depot.

I suppose, in theory, that stamping a signature instead of actually signing the endorsement on a Note could be okay … IF the person whose signature appears is actually the one doing the stamping.  For example, if Michelle Sjolander doesn’t sign a Note herself but stamps her own signature, I suppose that’s okay.  But do you think it actually works that way?  Hell no.

Don’t believe me?  Read this deposition of Michelle Sjolander.  She  acknowledges that she has never actually signed an endorsement and that she doesn’t even know how many stamps with her “signature” exist:

And do you know how many stamps were issued with
11 your name on them?
12 A Not the exact number. But many.
13 Q Could you estimate? Is it more than 10? More than
14 100?
15 A More than — more than 10.
16 Q Less than 50?
17 A I don’t — through the whole years, I can’t even
18 give that answer.
19 Q Okay. And what happens to the stamps? What happens
20 to the old stamps when you execute new stamps?
21 A I collect them and burn them.

Are any endorsements ever what you called wet ink
3 signature where someone actually signs the endorsement?
4 A It is — it is not — not — none of mine have been.
5 Q Okay. How about anyone else’s? Do you have any
6 knowledge if anyone else’s signatures are –
7 MR. TRINZ: Objection.
8 Q BY MS. LUNDERGAN: — physically placed on versus
9 stamping?
10 MR. TRINZ:
Objection. Outside of her knowledge.
11 THE WITNESS: Outside the scope of my business.
12 Q BY MS. LUNDERGAN: Okay. Do you have any knowledge
13 then of that?
14 A No.
15 Q Okay. How long has — you are no longer executing
16 endorsements, but when did you begin executing endorsements or
17 when did they begin using a stamped signature to execute your
18 endorsement?
19 A 2005.
20 Q And how did that arise? Was it something that they
21 asked you to do or was it something that became part of your
22 job position?
23 A Yes. My previous boss had left the company and my
24 stamp was replaced with his.

Nonetheless, the name Michelle Sjolander appears on hundreds, probably thousands, and perhaps tens of thousands of endorsements on “original” promissory notes in foreclosure cases.  She hasn’t signed her name, and she didn’t stamp it – but her ”signature” is regularly seen on original notes.  Any foreclosure attorney, such as myself, has undoubtedly seen her name dozens of times.

It’s bad enough that she’s not signing or stamping her own name.  But that’s not the worst of it.  Instead, let me ask you this …

Once you realize that Michelle Sjolander isn’t stamping her own name, and that dozens of stamps with her signature exist, what do you think the chances are that someone from the company for whom she works/worked stamped her signature on the original Notes, as opposed to someone from the company prosecuting the foreclosure case?

Personally, I’m convinced that banks often fail to obtain an endorsement from the bank that “transferred” the “original” Note to them, and merely stamp the Note so it looks like they got an endorsement.  Using my example, above, instead of Bank of America getting someone from U.S. Bank to endorse the Note, Bank of America merely stamps an endorsement on the Note itself.

This may well be the next big wave of foreclosure defense.  The argument?

“Yes, judge, I see the note is endorsed in blank.  But the endorsement is not self-authenticating when we have reason to believe it was not signed by the purported endorser, but that the alleged endorsement was stamped by the plaintiff itself.”

It’s really no different than if I started stamping “Pay to the Order of Stopa Law Firm” on a bunch of Notes, signed them, and foreclosed.  Nobody would think that is okay, so why is it overlooked if it’s done by banks?

Mark Stopa

www.stayinmyhome.com

Posted in Main | 12 Comments »

12 Responses to I’m Getting Rich, Banker-Style!!!

  1. Jay Schwartz says:

    Many thanks for sharing this. Hope you share you new found wealth, unlike some others. I’d give you my good seal of endorsement, but haven’t made it down to Office Depot. Wait. :P

  2. Nancy says:

    I have her lovely stamp on my note, which is a copy none the less! Blue Ink Signature…..strange how my black ink signature changed colors since signing the note.

  3. HungarianProse says:

    Mark: Can you please comment on the following Issues: Florida Statutes:692.01, 692.02,689.01, 673.5011, 609.04,673.3081 all these statutes are connected to your argument.
    BTW: you are the by far the best brain on foreclosure defense.

    • Mark Stopa Mark Stopa says:

      Thanks, ProSe.
      I’m not sure how to “comment” on each of those statutes, as each is a blog unto its own.
      Smart of you to be citing them, though.

      Mark

  4. Vivian says:

    I guess the banking industry has done a stellar job of branding to associate honesty and trust with a bank. I bought that perception myself hook line and sinker until I got a rude awakening that banks are not only capable of criminal stuff, but they routinely deal in organized planning to that end in huge numbers.

    Now if anything dealing with a mortgage offer comes from a bank, I look at it with great suspicion. What amazes me is how too many courts seem not to know this, and resist seeing this as criminal activity that should not be tolerated. That is a great analogy you made, Mark; it is no better than anybody getting their own endorsement from Office Depot and stamping all the notes they can ‘produce’ and then filing foreclosure on fake reasons. I guess before you decide to test this yourself, you should invest in the PR ad companies the banks have used to brand themselves as impeccably trustworthy, and let the brainwashing go on a bit before you go on your stamping spree. :o )

  5. Everte Farnell says:

    Because the banks are part of the financial system, and so vital to the system. The system is to make sure certain folks remain insanely rich.

  6. triumphant says:

    … Must be because the “equities favor” the bank and not you, huh? (You’ve won me over with your arguments on “equity” in foreclosure cases.) Hell, even crimes can be overlooked when granting foreclosures for banks.

    Can you comment on what seems to me to be the most apalling example of “equity” in foreclosure actions in Florida: Singleton v. Greymar Associates, SC 03-936, Supreme Court of Florida, decided September 15, 2004? In Singleton, the SC FL held that “a dismissal with prejudice in a mortgage foreclosure action does not necessarily bar a subsequent foreclosure action on the same mortgage” because, eseentially, to do so would be “inequitable.” I only hope the reasonable SC Justices realize now what a monster they unleashed with that decision.

    • Mark Stopa Mark Stopa says:

      Yeah, that is a monster.
      From my experience, though, I think the practical impact of that distinction is rather minimal.
      Very few cases have been dismissed “with prejudice,” and those that are, in my experience, haven’t been re-litigated.

      Have you seen this issue (i.e. whether a bank can re-file after a dismissal with prejudice) actually litigated in Florida?

  7. Mark Bowen says:

    Don’t let up on this Mark. I’ve been hoping to see Appellate decisions on this for some time, but most foreclosure appeals are “Affirmed”, leaving the Appellant with nothing but another fraud-complicit court ruling, this time in the REAL court of last resort. How absurd is it that Sjolander stated in her depo that she gave Power of Attorney to entities such as Recontrust to apply her signature stamp to certain types of documents. I can’t imagine a true court of law allowing anyone to stamp their own name, let alone allowing a stamp to be applied by someone else. Case in point – I have an “original” note with the stamped signature of David A. Specter who left Countrywide years before the endorsed note was produced. The question is, when was the stamp applied?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Anti-Spam Quiz: