With all the recent media attention that Stopa Law Firm has received, I’ve gotten a TON of positive feedback from clients and prospective clients in Florida and many other states.  Thank you to everyone who has encouraged the fight against the systemic fraud being perpetuated by banks every day. 

I’ve also gotten some criticism, too, allegedly because what I’m doing by defending homeowners facing foreclosure is “harming the economy.”  The criticism typically goes something like this: “Your clients are living for free, dragging down the value of my property, and you’re helping them do it.” 

Respectfully, people who say things like this are wrong.  It’s not a matter of opinion – they’re wrong.  And I can prove it. 

First off, my clients care about their homes.  Whether they’re living in them or renting them out, my clients haven’t abandoned their homes – they’re maintaining them.  My clients’ homes aren’t the vacant houses you see with foot-high grass that haven’t been inhabited in a year.  My clients are living in their houses (or, in some instances, renting them out), and actively trying to keep their houses via a loan modification.  I dare anyone to explain, in any intelligent way, how the economy is harmed when people live in their homes, maintain their homes, and try to enter a loan modification.  Who is harmed here?  Some CEO at a bank who gets an $800,000 bonus instead of $850,000?  Please.   

Nothing my clients are doing reduces the value of their neighbors’ houses.  You know what affects that value of these homes?  Abandoned houses.  And why are houses abandoned?  Because banks scare people into leaving their homes, making it easy for them to obtain a foreclosure judgment, but then banks don’t schedule a foreclosure sale because they don’t actually want the home.  What results is the property sits in limbo – the homeowner stopped paying and abandoned it long ago, but the bank won’t set the foreclosure sale, so nobody else can buy the property, either.  The homeowner is not living in it, and the bank doesn’t own it … the property just sits, empty, abandoned, for months, even years.    

Don’t believe me?  Go check the public records.  I’ve been doing that recently in Pinellas County, and it’s scary what I’ve found.  

For instance, there was a foreclosure sale scheduled tomorrow, July 13, 2010, in Case No. 08-2426-CI-08.  But the sale isn’t going forward because the bank cancelled the sale – for the third time.  In fact, the Court entered final judgment in September, 2009, yet the foreclosure sale has still not taken place.  It’s not because the homeowner has put up a fight, either – the homeowner never appeared in the case and lost by default – the bank just refuses to proceed with the foreclosure sale.  Sound impossible to believe?  Don’t take my word for it – here’s a cut-and-paste of the docket, from the clerk’s website: 

Reset Original Sort Link To Activity Code Date P/D Docket Entry Ver
1 Link to Case-related Persons DUMB 07/07/2010 CLERK FORECLOSURE SALE CANCELLED: PER FAX(KENB) N
2 Link to Case-related Persons FAXC 07/07/2010 PLAINTIFF FAX COPY OF CORRESPONDENCE: REQUEST CANCEL SALE F
3 Link to Case-related Persons DATC 06/15/2010 PLAINTIFF ORD RESCHED SALE CLW FOR: 071310 OR16947PG2397-002 F
4 Link to Case-related Persons MOTN 06/15/2010 PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR NEW SALE DATE F
5 Link to Case-related Persons MOTN 06/14/2010 PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR NEW SALE DATE F
6 Link to Case-related Persons DUMB 03/04/2010 CLERK FORECLOSURE SALE CANCELLED: NO REP AT SALE N
7 Link to Case-related Persons ORGR 03/03/2010 PLAINTIFF ORDER GRANTING MOITON TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY PLAINTIFF F
8 Link to Case-related Persons NOTH 02/01/2010 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF HEARING 030210 9:00 (TELEPHONIC) F
9 Link to Case-related Persons DATC 02/01/2010 PLAINTIFF ORD RESCHED SALE CLW FOR: 030410 OR16822PG1961-001 F
10 Link to Case-related Persons REFE 01/27/2010 PLAINTIFF RE-OPEN FEE PAID – $50.00 N
11 Link to Case-related Persons MOTN 01/25/2010 PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR NEW SALE DATE F
12 Link to Case-related Persons REOP 01/25/2010 PLAINTIFF REOPEN CASE/OTHER N
13 Link to Case-related Persons MOTN 01/15/2010 PLAINTIFF MOTION SUBSTITUTE PARTY F
14 Link to Case-related Persons ASIG 10/28/2009 PLAINTIFF ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGMENT OR16739PG1512-001 R
15 Link to Case-related Persons DUMB 10/23/2009 CLERK FORECLOSURE SALE CANCELLED: PER FAX(KENB) N
16 Link to Case-related Persons FAXC 10/23/2009 PLAINTIFF FAX COPY OF CORRESPONDENCE: REQUEST CANCEL SALE F
17 Link to Case-related Persons PBNS 10/09/2009 PLAINTIFF PUBLISHERS AFFIDAVIT NOTICE OF SALE F
18 Link to Case-related Persons NSGC 09/28/2009 CLERK NOTICE OF SALE/COPY TO GULF COAST BUS REV F
19 Link to Case-related Persons HOMC 09/17/2009 PLAINTIFF SALE SCHEDULED IN CLEARWATER FOR: 102309 OR16705PG0007-006 F
20 Link to Case-related Persons HOME 09/17/2009 PLAINTIFF FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE/JDMT AMOUNT $ 112143.45 F
21 Link to Case-related Persons DEJD 09/17/2009 PLAINTIFF DEFAULT JUDGMENT N
22 Link to Case-related Persons ATTY 09/17/2009 PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY COVER LETTER RCVD BY COURT 091009 F
23 Link to Case-related Persons NOTH 08/13/2009 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF HEARING 091709 9:30 F
24 Link to Case-related Persons CCOU 05/01/2009 PLAINTIFF CORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE: FROM COURT-RESET HEARING F
25 Link to Case-related Persons CCFP 05/01/2009 PLAINTIFF CERTIFICATION-COMPLIANCE W/FORECLOSURE PROC F
26 Link to Case-related Persons NOTH 02/20/2009 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF HEARING 043009 9:30 (TELEPHONIC) F
27 Link to Case-related Persons NOTH 12/22/2008 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF HEARING 043009 9:30 (TELEPHONIC) F
28 Link to Case-related Persons DEBT 09/15/2008 PLAINTIFF AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS F
29 Link to Case-related Persons FEES 07/10/2008 PLAINTIFF AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY FEES F
30 Link to Case-related Persons FILE 06/30/2008 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORTGAGE F
31 Link to Case-related Persons TEXT 05/08/2008 CLERK KALANI UHATAFE F
32 Link to Case-related Persons DEFA 05/08/2008 CLERK DEFAULT ENTERED /NAVITALAI UHATAFE/UNKNOWN SPOUSE NKA N
33 Link to Case-related Persons MODE 05/07/2008 PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR DEFAULT F
34 Link to Case-related Persons ARMY 05/07/2008 PLAINTIFF AFFIDAVIT AS TO MILITARY SERVICE F
35 Link to Case-related Persons DUPE 05/02/2008 PLAINTIFF UNKNOWN TENANTS IN POSSESSION F
36 Link to Case-related Persons DUPE 05/02/2008 PLAINTIFF JANE DOE F
37 Link to Case-related Persons DUPE 05/02/2008 PLAINTIFF JOHN DOE F
38 Link to Case-related Persons DROP 05/02/2008 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF DROPPING : F
39 Link to Case-related Persons SURN 03/10/2008 CLERK SUMMONS RETD NOT SERVED JOHN DOE F
40 Link to Case-related Persons SURN 03/10/2008 CLERK SUMMONS RETD NOT SERVED JANE DOE F
41 Link to Case-related Persons SURS 03/10/2008 CLERK SUMMONS RETD SERVED NAVITALAI UHATAFE 022108 F
42 Link to Case-related Persons DUPE 03/10/2008 CLERK 022108 N/K/A KALANI UHATAFE F
43 Link to Case-related Persons SURS 03/10/2008 CLERK SUMMONS RETD SERVED UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF NAVITALAI UHATAFE N
44 Link to Case-related Persons NOTC 03/06/2008 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF SCRIVENERS ERROR RE: PARTY PLTFF F
45 Link to Case-related Persons SUPP 02/20/2008 CLERK SUMMONS TO PROCESS SERVER – PICK UP HEAVEN SENT (4) N
46 Link to Case-related Persons LPRF 02/20/2008 PLAINTIFF LIS PENDENS RECORDING FEE PAID – $5.00 N
47 Link to Case-related Persons 02CI 02/20/2008 PLAINTIFF CIRCUIT CIVIL FILING FEE PAID $255.00 N
48 Link to Case-related Persons NOLP 02/19/2008 PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS OR16157PG0506-001 F
49 Link to Case-related Persons CCST 02/19/2008 PLAINTIFF CIVIL COVER SHEET F
50 Link to Case-related Persons COCS 02/19/2008 PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT AND COPY(S) F
51 Link to Case-related Persons SECT 02/19/2008 PLAINTIFF THIS CASE ASSIGNED BY CLERK TO SECTION 008 BY 3777 – RANDOM MF N

Lest you think this is an aberration, it’s not.  Check for yourselves.  Every day, whether it’s in Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Miami, or anywhere in between, banks are obtaining foreclosure judgments throughout Florida, then refusing to set the foreclosure sales.  This is what causes houses to remain abandoned and not maintained.  This is what drags down property values and harms the economy, not my clients.  The banks are causing houses to be abandoned, not my clients.   So next time you see a house that’s abandoned, don’t blame me.  And certainly don’t blame my clients.  Chances are, the bank owns the property – or scared the owner into moving out, got a foreclosure judgment, but doesn’t want to set a foreclosure sale, so the remains abandoned indefinitely. 

Am I the only one who thinks this is absurd?  How can banks get away with this?  Why are judges so quick to enter foreclosure judgments, and throw their neighbors on the streets, when banks are so slow to set foreclosure sales?  Why do my clients get cricitized in the media (which refuses to report about banks’ refusals to enter loan modifications), yet banks cause properties to be abandoned all over Florida and get off scot-free?  This is yet another illustration of how banks are harming the economy to help themselves.  Banks don’t care if the property is abandoned – if they don’t want to pay the insurance or property taxes, they won’t set the foreclosure sale.  

Here’s an idea for you, banks:  if you don’t want the properties, I’ve got 400(+) clients who will take them, maintain them, and make good use of them.  Better yet, if you’re not going to set the foreclosure sale, don’t scare away the homeowner.  Let the homeowner continue living in the home, maintaining the home, taking care of the home – just as my clients are doing.

0 Comments

  1. This is exactly why Chief Judge Peter Blanc’s comment quoted below is so absurd, not to mention the fact that aiming to move real estate deviates from the traditional role of the American system of justice. Oh, and many of these homes are not vacant or dilapidated!

    “It is important to clear the foreclosure cases so that vacant and dilapidated homes can go back on the market, presumably increasing neighborhood property values.”

    Source: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/real-estate/extra-help-hired-to-pare-caseload-787920.html

    Lisa
    ForeclosureHamlet.org

    • mstopa says:

      It is disappointing to read such an outlandish statement from a person in a position of authority.

      When a property has been abandoned, the homeowner has essentially turned over the keys – “here you go, bank.” In those cases, the bank wins the foreclosure case by default, without so much as a hearing, and can schedule the sale and put the property on the market immediately – IF IT SO CHOOSES. But that’s precisely the problem. All too often, the banks are choosing not to schedule the foreclosure sale, much less put the property on the market.

      Do you really think people would be abandoning their homes if they thought they could live in them? That makes no sense. People leave because they think they’ve lost their house, and the banks are the ones who are leaving it vacant. Maybe the banks aren’t sufficiently equipped to deal with the volume of inventory, but that’s just another reason why people shouldn’t leave.

  2. Peter says:

    Idle bank owned vacant homes became such a problem down in Miami non-profits began moving families in need of shelter into them. Waste not want not.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/10/us/10squatter.html?_r=2&hp

    • mstopa says:

      I don’t know whether to feel discouraged that the original homeowners had to leave their homes because the bank foreclosed on houses they did not want or encouraged that the houses were put to good use. Both, I suppose.

  3. John R. says:

    I’m from Dayton Ohio and before Florida became it, we were no 1 in foreclosures! I have friends who lost their property over 2 years ago, the Bank picked them up at the auctions for almost nothing….. but then they didn’t transfer the property into their name! My friend came home recently to find a warrant for his arrest for not taking care of the property he’d lost 2 years ago! Dayton actually, about 2 years ago, initiated a “shaming program” trying to get the Banks to do something with their foreclosed on properties. They posted the info on the Banks repo-ing the properties on the properties front doors saying they should at least do something about boarding them up and keeping the weeds down. The news article is probably still out there somewhere… try a search for Dayton shaming program…. there was a news video about it. At any rate, to date, the Banks have done nothing. Guess what’s coming Florida? Not a damn thing from the Banks except more dirty paperwork, more homelessness and more job loss. Welcome to Detroit and the Midwest’s lifestyle. But there is some good news for Dayton, squatters are moving into the abandoned houses! And if they just mow the lawn and act like nice neighbors, nobody cares! In fact….. they’re welcome. They’re the honest, hard working folks who were screwed by the Banksters….. they’re what ya call… neighbors you can depend on. I haven’t yet heard of even one instance where any one of the squatters snuck up behind anybody and stuck a knife in their back yet. What’s that term going around so often… oh yea… moral hazard. Have ya ever noticed how those that scream the most are off-times the perpetrators? Et too Brutee?

    • mstopa says:

      An arrest warrant for a property he lost two years ago. Crazy. But sadly, I’m not surprised.

      Eventually, everyone is going to realize that what my clients are doing (trying to keep their houses) is better than what the banks are doing (causing houses to be abandoned). I just hope that happens before Florida turns into Detroit.

      Thanks for sharing, John.

  4. Mark, great post. There are so few people who will tell it like it is these days. The more I audit, and blog, and talk to people about what’s going on, truly, the more absurd things look. Do you have any theories, at least that you’re comfortable posting, about what’s REALLY going on underneath all of this nonsense? I have several ideas, but I’d be interested in hearing what you think.

    Christine

  5. Keep posting stuff like this i really like it

  6. CNA License says:

    this post is very usefull thx!

  7. payday loans says:

    Hi buddy, your blog’ s design is simple and clean and i like it. Your blog posts are superb. Please keep them coming. Greets!!!

  8. I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am launching a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success.

  9. coffee diet says:

    Usually I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this article really forced me to do so! Thanks, really nice article.

  10. Loving that, good info!

  11. Olin Ruland says:

    Stumbled upon your internet site via msn the other day and absolutely like it. Continue the good work.

  12. Stumbled upon your website via bing the other day and absolutely think its great. Keep up the fantastic work.

  13. Veryncer says:

    I just linked this article on my facebook account. it’s an interesting read for everyone.

  14. Profoundly assets c incriminating evidence article, glowingly written and totally meditating out.

  15. Ваш сайт http://www.stayinmyhome.com нуждается в смене дизайна.
    Ну а тема Who is harming the economy – BANKS, not my clients | Foreclosure Defense & Strategic Default просто без картинок и видео. Весь инет забили таким контентом который вы хотите чтобы люди читали но кто щас в наше время вообще читает ???

  16. My Homepage says:

    … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More here: stayinmyhome.com/2010/07/who-is-harming-the-economy-banks-not-my-clients/ […]…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *